Chromatics

Crime and Punishment characters — the complete list

The complete cast, grouped by household — every name each character goes by, how to say the names aloud, what the names secretly mean — and, at the end, the two arguments about this novel worth having. The dots are the dialogue colors each speaker keeps in Chromatics. All in the Constance Garnett translation, the one in the app and on Project Gutenberg.

Why three namesThe name tableThe castWhat the names meanThe argumentsQuick answers

Why everyone has three names

Russians of Dostoevsky’s era carry a first name, a patronymic — their father’s name with -ovitch or -ovna attached — and a surname. Which one you use depends on who you are to them: Rodion Romanovitch to a police inspector, Rodya to your mother, Raskolnikov to the narrator. Add diminutives, and one anxious student answers to three or four names before breakfast. Dostoevsky’s first readers heard the warmth or chill in every variation; the rest of us flip back nineteen pages to check. This page exists for the flipping-back. The colors below are the longer-term fix.

Every name, one table

The ten characters whose names do the most shape-shifting, with the version the narrator uses, the formal address, the family diminutive, and a plain-English pronunciation — stress on the capitals.

The narrator saysFormal addressFamily & friends saySay it aloud
RaskolnikovRodion RomanovitchRodya, Rodenkarah‑SKOHL‑ni‑kof
DouniaAvdotya RomanovnaDounetchkaDOO‑nya · av‑DOHT‑ya
Pulcheria AlexandrovnaPulcheria Alexandrovna— (mothers outrank nicknames)pool‑KHEH‑ree‑ya
SoniaSofya SemyonovnaSonetchkaSOH‑nya · SOHF‑ya
MarmeladovSemyon Zaharovitchmar‑me‑LAH‑dof
Katerina IvanovnaKaterina Ivanovnaka‑te‑REE‑na ee‑VAH‑nov‑na
RazumihinDmitri Prokofitch“Vrazumihin,” by his own drunken flourishra‑zoo‑MEE‑khin
LuzhinPyotr Petrovitch— (no one is that fond of him)LOO‑zhin
SvidrigaïlovArkady Ivanovitchsvee‑dree‑GY‑lof (rhymes with “guy”)
Porfiry PetrovitchPorfiry Petrovitch— (no surname in the entire novel)por‑FEE‑ree pe‑TROH‑vitch

The novel is free in Chromatics right now — and in the app you stop needing this table by about Part II.

The cast

The Raskolnikovs

  • Raskolnikov= Rodion Romanovitch = Rodya The student. The axe. The seven-hundred-page argument with his own theory. A former law student, first of his class, who has stopped attending lectures, stopped eating regularly, and started believing that an extraordinary man may “step over” the rules that bind everyone else. He commits the murder in Part I; the remaining five parts are what the murder does to him. Proud, generous, cruel and tender within the same page — he gives his last roubles to the Marmeladovs, then despises himself for it.
  • Dounia= Avdotya Romanovna = Dounetchka His sister, and the spine of the family — her brother’s intelligence and pride with the self-command he lacks. She has endured Svidrigaïlov’s advances as a governess and accepted Luzhin’s proposal as an act of quiet family economics; the novel gives her the pleasure of dismantling both men, once with a speech and once with a revolver.
  • Pulcheria Alexandrovnatheir mother Writes the letter in Part I that sets the whole plot moving — Dounia’s troubles, Luzhin’s offer, the family riding to Petersburg on hope — then arrives in person to not be told anything by anyone. Dostoevsky lets her guess everything she is never told, which is the quiet tragedy of her last chapters.

The Marmeladovs

  • Sonia= Sofya Semyonovna = Sonetchka Marmeladov’s daughter by his first marriage, driven onto the streets with a yellow ticket to feed her stepmother’s children — and the novel’s quiet center of gravity. She judges no one, which unnerves Raskolnikov more than any prosecutor. She is the person he tells first, and hers is the reading of the raising of Lazarus — from a New Testament that belonged to Lizaveta — at the book’s exact hinge.
  • Marmeladov= Semyon Zaharovitch The drunk clerk whose tavern confession in Part I — “have you ever spent a night on a hay barge, on the Neva?” — out-aches everything around it. He has a post, loses it, regains it, drinks the salary, and knows precisely what he is doing to his family at every step, which is the horror of him. Father of Sonia; carried home twice, the second time for good.
  • Katerina Ivanovnahis wife Consumptive, proud, and magnificent in fury — an officer’s daughter who danced at a governor’s ball once and will remind you of it while coughing blood. Her memorial dinner for Marmeladov, thrown with money she cannot spare, collapses into the novel’s greatest scene of public unraveling — see below.
  • Polenkaand Lida and Kolya, the children Katerina Ivanovna’s three children by her first marriage — ten, and younger. Polenka’s embrace on the stairs, and her promise to pray “all the rest of my life,” is the one uncomplicated kindness Raskolnikov receives in the whole novel; he trades on the memory of it for weeks.
  • Amalia Ivanovnathe Marmeladovs’ landlady German, house-proud, and locked in a war of etiquette with Katerina Ivanovna, who needles her by getting her patronymic deliberately wrong. Their duel over the memorial dinner’s table settings escalates, roughly, into an eviction.

Suitors, friends, and predators

  • Razumihin= Dmitri Prokofitch Raskolnikov’s loyal, talkative university friend — the one functioning person in the book. Poor like Rodya, he responds by tutoring, translating, and scheming a small publishing venture rather than theorizing about axes. He nurses Raskolnikov through fever, shepherds the mother and sister, falls headlong for Dounia, and — in the epilogue — gets the nearest thing the novel offers to a happy ending. Introduces himself, three bottles in, as “Vrazumihin” — roughly, Bringer-to-Reason.
  • Luzhin= Pyotr Petrovitch Dounia’s fiancé, a lawyer of new money and newer opinions who wants a wife poor enough to be grateful, and says so in writing. Dismissed by Dounia in one scene, he attempts revenge by planting a hundred-rouble note on Sonia at the memorial dinner — the pettiest crime in a novel about crime, and the one that fails most completely.
  • Svidrigaïlov= Arkady Ivanovitch Dounia’s former employer, arrived in Petersburg with money, leisure, and no remaining reasons to behave — the abyss with manners. He is what Raskolnikov’s theory looks like when it stops apologizing: a man genuinely beyond conscience, and bored there. He takes the room on the other side of Sonia’s wall and hears every word of the confession. His last night — the fly, the mouse, the dreams, the revolver at dawn — is the darkest sequence Dostoevsky ever wrote. He would say he went to America.
  • Marfa PetrovnaSvidrigaïlov’s late wife Dead before the novel opens — of a stroke, a beating, or her husband, depending on who is gossiping — and busier than most living characters: she clears Dounia’s name across the whole province, wills her three thousand roubles, and calls on Svidrigaïlov three times as a ghost.
  • Lebeziatnikov= Andrey Semyonovitch Luzhin’s roommate, a collector of progressive opinions worn like this season’s coat — communes, rational marriage, the whole catalogue. Dostoevsky mocks him for fifty pages and then hands him the novel’s cleanest act of courage: he is the witness who saw Luzhin plant the note, and he says so, loudly, at the exact moment it matters.

The investigation

  • Porfiry Petrovitchno surname given, in the entire novel The examining magistrate — thirty-five, round, amused, and the ancestor of every detective who ever solved a case by chatting. He has no physical evidence and never needs any: his three conversations with Raskolnikov are the chess match of the book, played entirely with psychology, patience, and the occasional deliberate blunder. Distant kinsman of Razumihin, which is how he first gets his man to tea.
  • Ilya Petrovitch“the Explosive Lieutenant” The police lieutenant with the temper, forever half-erupting at somebody over nothing. By accident of shift schedules, he is the man sitting in the office when Raskolnikov finally walks in — so the novel’s most famous sentence is spoken to its least perceptive officer.
  • Zametov= Alexandr Grigorievitch, the head clerk Young, ringed, pomaded, and present for the strangest scene in the middle of the book: Raskolnikov, in a tavern called the Crystal Palace, leaning across the table to ask what if it was he who murdered the old woman — then laughing it off as fever. Zametov half-believes both halves.
  • Nikolay“Mikolka,” the painter A young house-painter from the flat below the murder scene who confesses to the crime he did not commit — out of a sectarian’s hunger to suffer, Porfiry explains, half in awe. His false confession buys Raskolnikov his last free weeks. (A drunken peasant called Mikolka also beats the mare to death in Raskolnikov’s dream in Part I — Dostoevsky reusing the name on purpose, guilt echoing before the fact.)
  • Zossimovthe doctor Twenty-seven, well-dressed, and languidly pleased with himself. Attends Raskolnikov’s fever and diagnoses everything except what is actually wrong — though his guess of “some fixed idea” lands closer than he ever learns.
  • The man from under the groundan artisan in a long coat Steps out of nowhere in the street, looks Raskolnikov in the eye, and says one word: “Murderer!” He saw something at the flat, told the police, doubted himself, and appears once more to apologize — a walking piece of Raskolnikov’s conscience with a hat on.

The pawnbroker’s flat

  • Alyona Ivanovnathe pawnbroker Sixty, tiny, sharp-eyed, keys on her belt, flannel round her neck in July. She lends kopecks on roubles, beats her sister, and has willed nearly everything to a monastery for the good of her soul. The theory is about her; the axe is for her. She is also — and the novel never lets you forget it — a frightened old woman in her own kitchen.
  • Lizaveta Ivanovnaher half-sister Thirty-five, gentle, simple, worked like a slave by her sister — and in the wrong room at the wrong moment: the second, unplanned murder that no version of the theory ever covered. She was Sonia’s friend; they exchanged crosses, and the New Testament Sonia reads from was hers. She speaks so rarely the app never assigns her a color — which is rather the point of her.

The rooming houses

  • Nastasyathe landlady’s servant Cook and only servant of the house, forever appearing in Raskolnikov’s doorway with tea, soup, gossip, and unsolicited common sense. She likes him, roughly the way one likes a stray cat that bites.
  • Praskovya Pavlovna“Pashenka,” the landlady Raskolnikov’s landlady, owed months of rent, to whose late daughter he was once engaged — a whole sad backstory the novel spends two paragraphs on. Shy to the point of invisibility: she never once appears in her own house, and Razumihin charms her entirely through closed doors.

Honest footnote: the dots are the dialogue colors as the app assigns them today, checked against the live book. Twelve voices speak often enough to earn a slot, and the palette holds exactly twelve — a coincidence Dostoevsky did nothing to deserve. Names with a dark chip print in the page’s own ink, like Lizaveta’s.

The names are doing something

Dostoevsky named his characters the way Dickens did — out loud. Russian readers hear these; in translation they go silent, so here they are:

Raskolnikov comes from raskol, “schism, split” — the word for the dissenters who broke from the Russian church. A man named Schism, divided against himself for seven hundred pages. Razumihin is built on razum, “reason, good sense” — and when he drunkenly upgrades himself to “Vrazumihin,” he is claiming the verb vrazumit: to talk sense into someone. He spends the novel trying. Luzhin sits in luzha, “a puddle” — shallow, and easy to step in. Marmeladov is exactly what it sounds like: marmalade — sweet, soft, and unable to hold any shape. Lebeziatnikov comes from lebezit, “to fawn, to toady” — a man whose convictions curtsy to whoever entered last. Sofya is Greek for wisdom, which is the novel’s entire argument about her, made quietly every time anyone says her name. And the tailor Sonia lodges with is called Kapernaumov — after Capernaum, the town where Christ healed the sick, which tells you what Dostoevsky thought happens in Sonia’s room.

Or skip the list. The color tells you.

Here is the memorial-dinner scene, three speakers deep in chaos. You have never met these people before this page, and you can still follow every accusation, because each voice holds its own color. That is what the page looks like in the app — and why, a few chapters in, you stop needing character lists at all.

“I have taken nothing,” Sonia whispered in terror, “you gave me ten roubles, here it is, take it.”

“And the hundred roubles you do not confess to taking?” he insisted reproachfully, not taking the note.

“What!” cried Katerina Ivanovna, suddenly realising the position, and she rushed at Luzhin. “What! You accuse her of stealing? Sonia? Ah, the wretches, the wretches!”

“Hold that mad woman!” he shouted.

Part V, Chapter III — Garnett translation, colors as the app assigns them.

The two arguments worth having

Did Dostoevsky earn the epilogue? This is the oldest fight about the book. For six parts, Raskolnikov out-argues everyone — Porfiry corners him psychologically, never logically — and then, in a dozen pages of epilogue in a Siberian prison, he throws himself at Sonia’s feet and the narrator announces “the dawn of a new future.” Generations of readers, starting with Dostoevsky’s own contemporaries, have called the conversion unearned — a religious ending stapled to a psychological novel, seven hundred pages of resistance dissolved in a paragraph. The defense: the novel plants it all along. Raskolnikov gives away money he cannot spare in nearly every part; he crosses himself in the street before he understands why; and the epilogue’s plague dream — every man on earth infected with the certainty that he alone is right — is his own theory returned as nightmare, the argument finally lost from the inside. Read the last ten pages and pick your camp; the book survives either verdict, which may be the point.

Is this translation any good? The version in the app — and on Project Gutenberg, and in most free editions — is Constance Garnett’s, from 1914. She translated some seventy Russian volumes at extraordinary speed, skipping phrases she couldn’t parse, and the knock has been the same for a century: her Dostoevsky and her Tolstoy come out sounding like the same polite Edwardian. Joseph Brodsky put the complaint in one line — English readers “can barely tell the difference between Tolstoy and Dostoevsky because they aren’t reading the prose of either one; they’re reading Constance Garnett.” The defense is just as real: Garnett is clear, fast, and quietly powerful; she is the version Hemingway, Faulkner, and two generations of English readers actually read; and later translators lean on her more than they say. If the fever-pitch scenes here grab you, the modern translations (Pevear & Volokhonsky’s, Oliver Ready’s) are worth the bookstore trip — but a hundred years of readers were not wrong to be devastated by this one, and this one is free.

Quick answers

Who is the main character of Crime and Punishment?

Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov, a former law student living in a rented closet in St. Petersburg. His mother calls him Rodya, officials call him Rodion Romanovitch, and the narrator calls him Raskolnikov — all three names are the same man, which is roughly why this page exists.

How do you pronounce Raskolnikov?

rah-SKOHL-ni-kof, stress on the second syllable. His first name, Rodion, is ruh-dee-OHN; the family nickname Rodya is ROH-dya. The full table of pronunciations is above.

Why does Raskolnikov kill the pawnbroker?

To test his theory that an extraordinary man — Napoleon is his standing example — has the right to step over ordinary morality if his ends justify it. The murder takes one chapter. The rest of the novel is the theory failing to survive contact with his own conscience, one fevered conversation at a time.

What does the name Raskolnikov mean?

It comes from raskol, the Russian word for schism or split — the word used for the dissenters who broke from the Orthodox Church. Dostoevsky named his hero a man divided in two, then wrote the division.

How many characters are in Crime and Punishment?

About two dozen named characters speak, and they sort into a few households — the Raskolnikovs, the Marmeladovs, Dounia’s suitors and friends, the investigators, and the pawnbroker’s flat — which is how the list above is arranged. Twelve speak often enough to carry a scene — which happens to be exactly the size of the app’s color palette.

Which translation spells it Dounia, Razumihin, Svidrigaïlov?

Constance Garnett’s 1914 translation — the one on Project Gutenberg and in the Chromatics app. Other translators render the same people as Dunya, Razumikhin, and Svidrigailov. Same cast, different alphabetic customs.

Keep going

The book’s own page is here. If the patronymics didn’t scare you off, the rest of the Russian novels collection is where this kind of reading gets habit-forming. And the other famous who’s-who problem in the catalog — two women with the same name, one of them a ghost — has a family tree.

Stop flipping back to check who Rodya is. Crime and Punishment is featured in Chromatics now — free in full, colors included.

Start reading free

Free on iPhone and iPad, currently through TestFlight. On Android? Leave an email.